Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only government and large companies can make a difference. What extent do you agree or disagree ?
In present era, environment issues become major concern due to numerous reasons which includes overpopulation, proliferation of pollution rate and so on. Therefore, according to statement, individuals cannot improve such issues. However, only legal authorities and big communities become able to tackle such problems. Thus, i agree with this notion and former view is more supportive. Yet, I also shed light on opposite side. Couple of view points are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, degradation of environment is increased day by day due to numerous practice which are done by homosapiens. Therefore, legal communities and large businesses can represent dominant role to overcome these problems because of their political and economical power. First and foremost manner is organisation of awareness programmes. Because, if such plan of actions are taken to aware public regards significance of environment. Thus, they may improve concerns related to environment. Moreover, another method is enforcement of laws and schemes which includes penalty charges due to which residents avoid such tasks which deteriorates their surrounding. For instance, number of dustbins are provided on public sites to prohibit littering of garbage and another example is car pooling and odd even car system. In this criteria, car pooling encourage citizens to promote utilisation of public transport and odd even car system includes permission to drive odd number on one day and opposition number car on another day. Due to such couple of schemes, emission of harmful gases and traffic congestions become reduce. As a result, such practices play pivotal role towards preservation of environment which are done with aid of law makers.
On contrast, individuals also represent valuable image in this notion. Because, if they become aware about importance of environment and avoid these practices which includes count of pollutions. Due to which, environment become degrade and polluted. Hence, they may promote conservation of environment.
To recapitulate, according to my outlook, although government and big business communities represent valuable role in improvement of environment. Yet, citizens also show their crucial character for its improvement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 21 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 11 | view |
- Today Tv channels broadcast men s sports shows more than women s sport shows Why is this case Should Tv channels give equal showtime for each 67
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree 73
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 67
- Nowadays more and more people from different cities are spending more time away from their families What are the possible reasons and effects on the people themselves and their families 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ome able to tackle such problems. Thus, i agree with this notion and former view ...
^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...problems because of their political and economical power. First and foremost manner is org...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...car pooling and odd even car system. In this criteria, car pooling encourage citizen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70623145401 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08582799907 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.11152388 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4090909091 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0798449091329 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241556400604 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263028099766 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525834974396 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112338270895 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.