Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believes that the impact from government or large companies policies, or activites is higher than impacts from individual, while there are some argument against this idea. In this essay, I will examine both of these views and also my opinion.
There are many supports of the idea that the government and big firms’ acts bring about higher impact to our society. First and foremost, the government and the large companies have a strong financial status and sufficient cashflow for investments. This is because large firms are the main contributor in our economic growth from their huge trading volume or their big investment. While, government can spend a huge budget or create a national debt for infrastructure development. As a result of their aggressive investment, there is a high dynamic movement in economic progress and also the country’s development. What is more, both of them can access to very large customer base or citizens due to the fact that they have variety of channels to broadcast their intentions, campaigns, and policies , such as advertisements, TV programs, bill boards, or social events. Thus, it is easier to make some developments or impacts from having an adequate accessibility to their audiences.
On the other hand, each individual can also make enormous impacts to the country for many reasons. First, there are several developments that requires a collaboration from each households, such as teaching and raising a child to be a good person. Seeing that, eventhough government provides an identical particular curriculum to all schools, parents still have a responsibility to teach their young people to identify good and bad things resulting in reduction in our social problems rate. In addition, the environmental issues are all people’s responsibility. Because, only treatment or preservation activity from government can not address the problems. For example, the government spends budget in forest development, but there are some groups of people cut down the trees for their business. Thus, the collaboration from each citizens could lead to big positive impacts to our country.
In conclusion, although the collaboration from everyone in the country can make the difference, but, in the real world, it seems quite hard to enforce all people to follow. Thus, in my opinion, I agree that large companies and government are main contributors of our country’s movement due to their strong financial position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past. Why?Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people believes that the impact fro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 809, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...heir intentions, campaigns, and policies , such as advertisements, TV programs, bi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3641025641 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08867131678 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6042361791 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16463386682 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556237184011 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478841423171 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107686378148 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368911991529 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.