Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a
difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the government and large enterprises play a vital role in protecting environment. While some argue that national citizens do not have any actions to make a contribution to help combat environmental degradation, I completely disagree with this statement.
The first reason in favor of my argument is that the authority and large corporations take responsibility for taking steps to alleviate ecological crisis. From powerful national leader perspective, environment standard policies must be enacted and enforced internationally. These rules are more likely to be useful to cover an enormous number of obstacles to overcome such as the protection of endangered species, a halt to habitat destruction as well as those funds used for investigating alternative energy sources, aiming to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. In terms of corporate responsibility, all producers should invest a large amount of money in modern technologies to handle and clean these toxic chemical waste instead of releasing them into the air. Moreover, managers should control and cut down on emissions from their factories, reducing smoke and exhaust fumes as much as possible. At last but not least, achieving sustainable development plan those managers have a tendency to conduct is just only successful by not depleting natural sources.
Another reason supporting my view is that individuals can exert profound effects on ecological system. These include changing patterns of consumption of citizens. For example, eliminating all products made of plastic has been linked to replacing plastic material with the clean sustainable materials for production of green products such as bamboo straws, coconut bowls. Moreover, a limitation of using nylon-based bag is one of main contributor to build up the green environment. In addition, buying local products can reduce food miles as well as smoke from means of transportation. A different option to protect the environment is to take part in NGOs, directing to raise fund to protect plants and animals on the brink of extinction. In other words, this can emphasize on the green movement based on initiatives operated by government
In conclusion, while authority and big businesses have a greater responsibility for reducing environmental problems, locals play a significant role in that. I totally disagree that individuals are powerless to save our earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48517520216 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18622097895 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625336927224 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9001875494 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1875 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142557563032 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435771495431 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463279190652 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092838060222 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568538144259 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.