International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that worldwide travel industry is beneficial to both tourists and the nations that they travelled. Some argue that none of parties could gain any benefit from international industry, even exert negative impacts. In my opinion, the advantages from that outweigh the disadvantages
On the one hand, travel industry experiencing a phenomenal growth is more likely to cause some detrimental effects. In terms of environment, there is a significant increase in the transportation industry because an increasing number of tourists are brought by travel, particularly is international one. As a result, deterioration in the environment would take place in the country which is used to be environmentally friendly. Moreover, travel is more inclined to damage to cultural traditions, it means that as many visitors as travel bring could provoke some loss of traditional cultures. Those inherits which are protected by government, for instance, are commercial possibilities that earn money for the country when tourists pay an amount of money to visit them.
On the other hand, beside those disadvantages I have mentioned above, there are also some advantages of growing travel figures. The first one could be that country economy would be better such as more jobs offered to citizens, living standards improved in parallel with growth of travel industry. Consequently, residents are more likely to have the better lives they have never had before. Moreover, cultural traditions would be furnished or maintained by the big money coming from entrance pay. Thanks to that, inherits would be recovered after a number of natural disasters and descended down to the young generation.
In conclusion, it seems me that travel among countries either brings benefits or cause negative impacts, which depends on the way citizens make use of them. Personally, the advantages still outweigh the disadvantages in general
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Dongvo | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | Ngô Chí Hào | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | ghotimus | 11 | view |
| 2017-09-07 | Sue Ng. | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 70
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make adifference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 581, Rule ID: DESCEND_DOWN[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'descended'.
Suggestion: descended
...after a number of natural disasters and descended down to the young generation. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...descended down to the young generation. In conclusion, it seems me that travel a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44630872483 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04952145425 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3824584695 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304780446644 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100993954626 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829022742404 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192533506071 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490845134922 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.