Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Those who say that governments should use the money to build programmes and encourage the populace to be active rather than they have to spend much money on training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics. In my opinion, I think that not only programmes related to health should be spent much money, but also training athletes to win Olympic medals needs.
The most famous, significant and biggest Olympic Games are organized once four years all over the world. There are millions of audiences follow every performance. Athletes must pass out many exams before they can take part in the big game. It can be said that they are the best representatives of a country and it is pride for anyone. As well as a country with many more athletes win gold medals in the Olympics will be famous on over the world and noted for a long time later. Hense, I think that the government spend on training athletes is rather reasonable and extremely necessary.
On the other hand, The government should not forget spending on public programmes to encourage populace to be dynamic and be healthier. When citizens take care of their health and do exercises frequently, more and more talents appear. It is clear that in developed countries have a lot of the best athletes than developing countries where the governments can't afford to cover for public programmes involve promoting health. So, I recommend that spending the budget on programmes encouraging people is super vital and essential.
In general, governments should use budgets for spending not only training athletes to win medals at the Olympics, but also public programmes that enhance the health of the populace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eloping countries where the governments cant afford to cover for public programmes i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, i think, in general, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95729537367 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66064635366 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519572953737 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2016626638 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36634823209 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127350549146 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109681342118 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24743007921 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822823287494 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.