Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answe

Firstly, investing more resources in maintaining a nation's athlete ensures more chances of victory in the Olympics, and this tournament is worldwide. This is a matter of patriotism and pride, a countries with many medalists will be seen as the top country for certain sport. For example, vietnamese athletes travel to the US to study archery. Secondly, money spent on athletes concludes the constructs and maintain of sports facilities that can be useful to the public. Practice is needed for an athlete to compete in such large competition; thus, all sport equipment should be in constant good shape. Lastly, the athletes represent their countries, they show other countries the economic power and living condition of their homeland. Their performances in the game show the world the capability to train athletes and the power of the nation. For example, athletes from foreign countries travel to countries with gold medalists to train.
However all things should be balanced; If the government neglects the public's health, there are consequences. a society with a downgrade physical health means a decline in the work force, thus can affects the economy adversely. Moreover, ifthe public's health condition is bad, the public can be vulnerable to diseases and again stunt the nation's economy.
In conclusion, resources should be spent equally on athletes and the public to ensures the development of a nation.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...vesting more resources in maintaining a nations athlete ensures more chances of victory...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a country' or simply 'countries'?
Suggestion: a country; countries
...is is a matter of patriotism and pride, a countries with many medalists will be seen as the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ountries with gold medalists to train. However all things should be balanced; If the g...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...alanced; If the government neglects the publics health, there are consequences. a socie...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...publics health, there are consequences. a society with a downgrade physical healt...
^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...s a decline in the work force, thus can affects the economy adversely. Moreover, ifthe ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...nerable to diseases and again stunt the nations economy. In conclusion, resources shou...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 225.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79644924772 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1016513971 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200203757146 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779556848948 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315886321028 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130905634288 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280567183071 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.