There is a long-standing controversy regarding environmental issues worldwide. Thus, governments and various organisations across the world need to make considerable efforts to lessen a high level of consumption in oil or gas readily. I am in favour of this statement due to some reasons.
Some people argue that the usage of fossil fuels in this modern society is inevitable. The main reason is that many citizens in the world highly rely on such energy resources like oil and gas. For example, despite huge endurance to make a green environment in many countries, still many nations, especially developed ones utilise a large amount of oil for heating or air conditioning systems. Besides, as many commuters or employees tend to make use of their private vehicles in metropolitan cities consistently, it seems to be difficult for them not to use fossil fuels ever again for them.
However, it is time that every country should cooperate with many global companies to tackle the global environmental concerns altogether. This is because serious difficulties of ecological degradation and some pollutions are generated by such energies which emit harmful chemical and CO2 gases substantially as harmful gases and chemicals are trapped in the air. Compared to the five decades, our national environmental condition aggravated considerably. To matter worse, not only the public is more likely to suffer from health disorders such as asthma and respiratory illnesses, but also many animals are in the danger of being extinctions due to the worse atmosphere in their national habitats.
In conclusion, I absolutely, agree with the idea that many countries around the world need to work with a variety of international communities to sort out the environmental deteriorations by not taking advantage of oil or other gases anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...any commuters or employees tend to make a sue of their private vehicles in metropolit...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, regarding, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32042253521 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16396115157 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6810156445 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13494667894 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431475896161 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365082497869 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764763194917 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240916914777 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.