The development of the Internet services provides a variety of information and knowledge to users. In this society, some people take advantage of finding measures online to cure their illnesses or disorders. I believe that generally, this is beneficial for the public due to some distinctive reasons.
Opponents who are against using online materials for solving individual's diseases argue that as counterless information on the Internet websites could be highly invalid and unauthorised, such references can bring about adverse influences on patients' health. It means that without the accurate and understandable academic knowledge of medical theories, medical conditions in each patient can become worse by diagnosing by themselves in a wrong way. Similarly, although there are severe wounds or injuries which are needed to have doctors' treatments or cares, many patients prefer not to visit the hospital often due to a wrong belief about their sickness provided by online resources.
However, usually, a lot of information on precautions and preventions regarding medical problems especially, chronic disease such as diabetes and heart disease online is indeed beneficial. This is because many people can easily check their health conditions and some symptoms as well as discover the methods of avoiding some serious health issues. Personally, when I had skin rash and irritation, reading online sources related to skin irritating helped me significantly to prevent an aggravation of it, by eating more or organic food and wearing fabrics which were made of cotton. Hence, not to see doctors in person, I could handle the illnesses readily.
In conclusion, I think usually online-based information concerning medical cures can be practical and effective because it suggests some useful ways of precautions and preventions to all patients efficiently, in spite of some potential concerns of it.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 78
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organisation, while others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household which lead to environmental problems 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...s can bring about adverse influences on patients health. It means that without the accur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ecome worse by diagnosing by themselves in a wrong way. Similarly, although there are severe w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: usually think
...illnesses readily. In conclusion, I think usually online-based information concerning med...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58275862069 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00468322526 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7752245552 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.181818182 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125619440771 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496111373272 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324867135497 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832802918608 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298636958878 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.