International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
In recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the convenience of international tourism. It is a common things now and become more affordable, so people available to achieve it easily. In this essay I intend to argue that this kind of phenomenon is a propitious trend to society at large. There are two primary reasons for this.
First of all, it is an undeniable fact that International Tourism helps foreign exchange to every tourism destination country. While the international tourism liven up, the tourism destination country gets benefit from it such as a rise of economic rates, culture exchange, liven up the prosperity and win one’s spurs all over the world. These past years, every country have promoted their tourism place or attraction. Attractive commercial given also have a great impact to made the international tourism become more popular.
Further and even more importantly, knowledge and education sharing from all over the world be spread evenly and become affordable. Multilateral agreement have brought significant impact, especially for developing country. The convenience of International tourism now more than ever before is one of the results. However, though, some of International Tourism also responsible for transnational crimes. So, the convenience of it still needs multilateral regulations to prevent that problem.
By way of conclusion, I believe that International tourism will continue to become more common as the pace of convenience increase. Given the benefit associated with this trend, I believe that positive result will be more perceived rather than the negative impact as long as the regulation keep provided to ensure the safetiness of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | vivukhue | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
- Birth Rate 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 84
- fast food 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, while, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42803030303 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06448289941 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0965607124 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311868693138 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100114924738 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730208265634 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185168517232 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023579731232 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.