International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do advantages outweight the disadvantages?
it is true that international tourism do wonders for the host nation and visitors. While there are serious negative consequences of this development, I would agree that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why travelling overseas hurts backpackers and the host country. In terms of tourists themselves, instead of having a whale of time, visitors are often overcharged for everything, from booking a taxi or buying souvenir. Locals use to take advantages of travellers in order to get more money, which can improve their living standards. In terms of the host nation, habitat destruction is increasingly become an alarming issue due to the unconsciousness of some tourists. In the height of tourist season, some popular places are thronged with visitors all over the world, which some of them do not aware of alleviating environmental problems but littering garbage and trashes in these magnificent landscapes without hesitating. take Vietnam as an example, Cua Lo Beach is one of a breathtaking views before having been damaged by pollutions from visitors.
On the other hand, it is undoubtably to say that there are far more pros than cons. Firstly, the host country will gain more benefits if tourism industry get larger. The influx of foreign tourists brings money to the host country through the provision of jobs and services in tourism market and reduces the unemployed rates in that nation. Secondly, the country culture can be widely known, which can improve the country's imagine through international counterparts.
In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of international travel to both travellers and the host country are greater than the drawbacks, serious thought these are.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on research other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education Do you agree or disagree 92
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world.What are the reason for this,and how can people learn more about the natural world? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that international tourism do w...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...oking a taxi or buying souvenir. Locals use to take advantages of travellers in ord...
^^^
Line 5, column 773, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...nificent landscapes without hesitating. take Vietnam as an example, Cua Lo Beach is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'view'?
Suggestion: view
..., Cua Lo Beach is one of a breathtaking views before having been damaged by pollution...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28928571429 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96336259292 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5183167501 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197804607752 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663455918552 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956999488471 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145556707636 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122788621815 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.