In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on research other planets to live, such as Mars.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree ?
It is inevitable that the Earth is no longer suitable for the sustainability of human civilization. Some people believe that funding should be diverted toward space exploration in order to search for a shelter for future generations. From my perspective, I strongly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, continue working and living on the Earth has been scientifically proven that it will be difficult – if not impossible in the next 10 decades. Due to ever-growing population, our planet is facing an unprecedented resource problem, which government leaders struggle to accommodate sufficiently basic needs for people survival. Since not all nature resources are sustainable, people have to stop overexploiting some rare sources such as rare mental for their own will if they are aware of the survival of humankind. Furthermore, an avalanche of people for planet supports might become unmanageable for the capacity of our planet, which results in the quest for a new homeland.
Taking into those above-mentioned characteristics, I am convinced that authorities and bodies should pour money into space research as the need of locating a new platform for human-being. Firstly, there are countless planets orbiting stars throughout the cosmos, which requires a great deal of efforts as well as expenditure to find a suitable shelter for our second homeland. For example, officials have to invest heavily in finding out Mars that bearing a close resemblance to the Earth, which is a potential backup for human’s place of resident. Secondly, placing more importance on searching a shelter for people’s re-settlement might ignite people’s enthusiasm in space investigation, which can benefit the society as a whole. Once they know that space-related technologies are feasible, public will be inspired to think for the foreseeable future in lieu of being preoccupied with contemporary only. Therefore, the society will be able to experience a giant leap for mankind.
In conclusion, allocating resources to preliminary investigation is integral to our attempt. I content that spending expenditure on alternative homeland on the outer space to supersede the Earth, which can die out overtime, is worth.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on research other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world.What are the reason for this,and how can people learn more about the natural world? 78
- International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do advantages outweight the disadvantages? 78
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1821 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.309 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.148 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 82 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.898 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.019 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5