Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using the internet to make financial transactions. What can be done to tackle this problem?
While the web-based offence has been growing at a rapid pace, as an increasing number of individuals are using the internet for money transactions, it could be mitigated. I firmly believe that governments should have to introduce strict cybercrime laws and create awareness in order to curb the crime ratio.
One of the chief reasons for rising internet-based evil is the ease of access to personal information from social media platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter, and What’s App. Hackers trap innocent people by sending them messages on their profiles and ask useful information about bank accounts. For example, in South Asia, particularly in Pakistan and India, Looters tend to make phone calls for the sake of getting valuable information by pretending bank employees. So, once they grab entire account details, they transfer funds in no time. As a result, people may deprive of precious money unintentionally.
However, there are several remedies that can be helpful to halt this rising menace. One of the most prominent solutions is that the States ought to set new rules for shielding people from computer-based crimes. If someone breaches the law, a fixed punishment should be applied to these culprits in terms of putting them into the jail. By doing so, the crime level may be reduced, and criminals would not dare to re-offend. For example, if the government punish hackers and set a benchmark, criminal intentions could be discouraged.
Furthermore, the government can deter the crime rate by raising awareness via using social media and TV. Because if people aware of such activities, they would never share the useful information again. As the root cause of the problem lies also in a lack of education about cybercrime. Therefore, these methods will be benefited immensely and bring a revolutionary change at a large-scale.
In conclusion, although with the advent technology criminals may approach information conveniently, I think, if authorities play an active role in monitoring these activities, this issue could be solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-03 | kamalena | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | sheetal340 | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ver share the useful information again. As the root cause of the problem lies also...
^^
Line 8, column 376, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ely and bring a revolutionary change at a large-scale. In conclusion, although with the ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30581039755 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9674262723 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62996941896 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6774435127 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.058823529 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195753863545 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543601259251 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383707444378 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986586755411 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032676078275 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.