The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.
Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this
technology has been positive.
Internet and technology advancement has shifted the way we live in the past few years. At some point, this change brings some drawbacks. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the overall benefits of having such connectivity outweigh the downsides.
To begin with, one of the most significant use of the internet is to find information on the go. Search engine such as google has helped many people around the world to get their assignment done in just few clicks. By comparison, before the digital era, people had to go to the library and search through the books for long hours to finish their homework. Another great utilization of internet is to find physical addresses. Having their mobile devices always connected to the internet, everyone now can find the fastest route from one point to another.
Unfortunately, the ease of access to almost everything in the world can have a detrimental effect to people’s mental and physical health. As a famous book author, Malcolm Gladwell said, “too much information can be bad sometimes”, the abundant of information and resources on the internet make some students feel overwhelmed and cannot decide which resources are most relevant to their needs. Moreover, since now it is much easier to order foods and beverages via internet, people tend to eat and drink more while not doing any exercises. This new habits, if remains, can cause some health problems in their future.
All in all, I strongly think that the internet has helped us get things done faster and easier. However, people need to be careful and wise when using this technology. Setting some limits in their internet usage and balancing between online and offline activities would be beneficial in maintaining their healths.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 84 | view |
- fast food 78
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Effect of Internet 61
- Debating for Cigarette 56
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77210055994 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8212805937 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137548236456 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489292876577 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398101502569 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959111143567 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665140274142 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.