The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive.
Prevalence of fast food has been becoming progressively risen in almost all of the countries.
Disputable notion as to whether the overall effect of this immensely-widespread fame has been
positive or negative. In person, I really believe that the fast food brought many disadvantages other
than its benefits.
First of all, the increasing rate of people being suffered from NCD (non communicable disease) - the
diseases which occurred in the long-term period namely heart attack, diabetes, high blood pressure
and cholesterol - is most likely to be caused by excessive consumption of fast food. Regardless of
nutrient content and ingredient, people nowadays tend to get food they want to eat instantly.
Consequently, many consume more sugar, salt and red meat beyond the daily limit by means of
drinking soda, eating burger and consuming others kind of fast food (as known as junk food)
heretofore.
Another fairly important thing is that consuming fast food, especially disproportionately, may result in
obesity, which one of the communicable disease (CD), for not only adults, but also millennial
adolescents that currently have serious trouble of overweight. Hence, popular culture of consuming
western-wise food has a significant impact to healthy life of people live today.
Undoubtedly, fast food consumed over the world has main aim to expedite food service and cut
waiting time of preservation. Accordingly, fast food is well accepted and significantly developing in
many countries. However, I would contend that this unhealthy behavior has generally been negative
because of its influence on well-being life and possibility of suffering imminent diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | Hamsam | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | khoathanh97 | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | el-naz | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | el-naz | 78 | view |
- Debating for Cigarette 56
- Development Maps 11
- Falling of Educational Standard 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... becoming progressively risen in almost all of the countries. Disputable notion as to whe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ll of the countries. Disputable notion as to whether the overall effect of this immensely-wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, really, so, well, as to, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65354330709 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19530294925 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688976377953 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5772839121 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.545454545 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.38176352705 388% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814648617268 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400762178316 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062754714487 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0293473309897 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508490908464 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.