It is believed that people who read for pleasure develop their imagination more and acquire better language skills compared to people who prefer watching television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Pleasure reading enhances the creativity and linguistic ability of the people in contrast to television viewers. I agree with the statement because readers often have the capability to imagine, scrutiny, and wide range of knowledge regarding various languages and developments.
On the one hand, people who addicted to television than the reading might have interested in live or recorded podcasts. Such programs mostly provide eye catching contents and moments at a minimal period of time. For instance, when news or proposals comes through the television might give exact situation as a near site such as a catastrophic environmental hazard. This kind of impact may pass out within one or two weeks from the viewers mind most probably. Similarly, spectators could not get time to imagine or rethinking about the subjects because it is well structured in the television. Furthermore, viewers does not have an opportunity to read the subtitles or flash news instead of they are concentrating the anchors or news readers vocals to aware about the texts.
On n the other hand, those who are interested to read always shows a vast knowledge regarding various issues, contents and developments. Reading improves the ability of understanding, flourish the intelligence, social, cultural and traditional skills including other languages and nations. For example, when people read a note they would have a chance to imagine the facts, based on their creative ability like, traditional costumes, cultural diversity and so on. Moreover, reading may help the person to enrich intriguing nature related to other language varieties to expand their inner thoughts. When the person read interestingly would have thirst to know about other languages and new vocabularies. To explain, new words from an article would insist to learn the meaning, and alternative words which improve multilingual skills.
To sum up, people who often rely on TV news may mitigate to grasp innovative things and creation. Whereas, reading helps everyone to aware about different languages and increased thinking ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | eyraen | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | faisal vhora | 84 | view |
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- Some people think that the best way to gather information is through newspapers while others believe in other better ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- it is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost it seem that we cannot have these things together to what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 48
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 72
- many people think that countries should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible to what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...live or recorded podcasts. Such programs mostly provide eye catching contents and...
^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ching contents and moments at a minimal period of time. For instance, when news or proposals c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titles or flash news instead of they are concentrating the anchors or news reader...
^^
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e would insist to learn the meaning, and alternative words which improve multilin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, such as, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44307692308 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90166408081 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1374278098 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21095414138 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671689049251 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546095678402 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129327350658 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203437192029 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.