Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment.
Do you agree or disagree
It is a governmental responsibility to make people aware and take care of their local surroundings. I agree with this statement because sustainable legislation of governance would have the longevity of nature for the future.
Everyone has a self obligation to the environment for nurturing and protecting their local areas. It would not be due to the pressure or liability but it must be the commitment to the place we live. When people kept the habitat safe from hazards, pollution, and disruption of the natural phenomenon it would be reverse in safe and secure earth and free from natural calamities. Likewise, school authorities or families could do more about environmental protection irrespective of government policies. For instance, in India, service week in November month helps children to be aware and interested to take care of their school atmosphere and home surroundings.
Nevertheless, it is the responsibility of the government to make legislation, rules and regulations to pamper the environment. This is because, a strict and liable control may inhibit the negligence of many, for instance, waste disposal, water pollution, and so on. Judiciary laws against the rule breakers would have tremendous diminish to the harm of nature. The government would make ordinances, awareness programmes, proposals to the people through the local community members would help to monitor and provide education to the illiterates. Similarly, complementary awards to the environmental protectors and social workers through the government administration enhance the people to be more responsible. Government should conduct educational programmes, cultural and roadshows regarding the importance of atmosphere protection also encourage society to be more active and sincere to at least their living area.
To sum up, maintaining the own surroundings would be the duty of everyone. Even though, choice of legal administration from the government could do more than anyone to make people conscious and informative the importance of facts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | phiennn | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | tinavuuuu | 73 | view |
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the chart below shows the average spending on cloths per person in US in 1985 1995 and 2005 56
- Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process shown 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, may, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, at least, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59677419355 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28066419254 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1463172991 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272581520166 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903635196647 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685107513341 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177027207115 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051218506296 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.