There are various methods to preserve historical events and this is a controversial issue that which one is useful. Some people believe that recording films and videos of previous people's lifestyle is better than written evidences. However, both of them are helpful, I think the best approach for conservation of ancient incidents is written documents.
In the one hand, it is obvious that ancestors transform the information to the next generations from long times ago with writing and painting on diverse surfaces of materials like papers and wall of caves. In fact, entire occurrences were sculptured as a valuable and valid documents. Furthermore, people who lived before the technology, were used letters and handwritten papers to show their emotions and individual communications. Information in written sources is easy to communicate because many people can read and write. Additionally, since it is not easy to change what is written, these sources of information are more accurate than others. In this case, these types of documents are clear and substantial.
On the other hand, this is true that records of films and videos are profitable in many ways, but they cannot be a perfect replacement for written documents due to some reasons. Firstly, record of films cannot cover all information and there always are some limitations, especially in term of its access to important persons and events. Secondly, number of directors attempt to produce appealing and attractive videos for viewers. Therefore, there might be some exaggerated and manipulated scenes which can lead to misunderstandings.
In conclusion, variety of ways are performed to preserve the data from lives of people and significant occurrences from past. In my opinion, written papers and evidences are ideal choice to preserve archaic documents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... recording films and videos of previous peoples lifestyle is better than written eviden...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39160839161 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01869571832 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6363511041 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240636402766 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709118249432 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814271464725 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1365050945 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354586966503 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.