It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. What are the causes? What can be done to improve the situation?
It can be easily realized that families’ bonding are now less connective than they used to be in the past. This situation derives from numerous reasons and appropriate measures can be taken to tackle this.
To begin with, there are several components that result in the deficiency of connection between families’ members. To be specific, the advance in contemporary technological tools has an immense impact on every family in the whole world. In the previous decade, although some technological gadgets were invented, they were not really prevalent at that time because not all families were able to purchase fancy gadgets for themselves. So each family member could devote more time to gathering with their family than in current society. By contrast, people now tend to immerse themselves in virtual life and pay less attention to strengthen families’ bonds which finally result in the separation between families’ members. Taking my family as a typical example, in the past me and my sisters or brothers had a tendency to play a plethora of folk games together such as hide and seek, fly the kite and so on. However, since smartphones and technological stuffs became more accessible for everyone, we spend more time playing online games instead of conventional games so our connection is weakened day by day. As a result, this phenomenon is considered as an obstacle which can break the happiness of a family.
Efforts can be made by each individual in families to deal with this situation efficiently. For the youngsters, they are recommended to avoid using electronic devices which prevent them from having a conversation with their parents or relatives when they have spare time. Insteadly, they should spend more time gathering with their family whenever they have the chance which can narrow the gap between family members. Besides, every parent is opposed to striking up a conversation more frequently in order to reinforce the relationship between parents and sons. In addition, they had better propagate the consequence of overusing smartphones or other electronic devices that have electro-magnetic waves.
In short, the lack of connection between family members is still a complex issue that requires multiple choices to counter.
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people think technological devices such as smart phones tablets and mobile phones bring more disadvantages than advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991 73
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 67
- The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, really, so, still, then, in addition, in short, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28611111111 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8987531909 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1903360263 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218744368128 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818723152158 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842757718171 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15395652174 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105330334473 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.