One of the most controversial issues has relevance to the innate and upbringing methods that make up the number of outstanding athletes and composers. While several individuals opine that the result of a superior gene pattern would exert the victory in the above two fields, others assert that intense training is the decisive factor in sporting and musical achievements. This essay examines this question from both points of view and then states my perspective, being that a combination of both is the key to success.
Many claim that one set of genes outperforming others can lead to further accomplishment. Fundamentally, when a youngster is born with a distinctive talent, it is undemanding to grasp the quintessential points in the knowledge of sport and music. Therefore, when a child's aptitude is discovered and recognized, their sensibilities in the art would be a firm springboard to overcome other teenagers, and at the same time gain triumph effortlessly. For instance, BBC News reported that about 3% out of 4% of wealthy people in the US are naturally talented in their expertise’s area such as arts, sports, investing, etc. In short, a faultless set of genes would lead to the prospects for a young person to thrive as a prodigy.
On the other hand, a lot of reasonable ideas have been put forward, claiming that children's breakthroughs and achievements are due to the fact that they are taught and studied in a precise and disciplined way. Moreover, an advisable educational plan would beget an orientation to their peculiar interests. Simultaneously, principal factors for an individual's attainment are studying methodically and mastering specialized knowledge in a self-controlled manner. Take the case about violin geniuses as a concrete example: distinguished violinists must be properly studied, regularly exposed, and seriously passionate about this sophisticated art. Therefore, it is probable for an adolescent without faculty to excel at fields such as sport and music if they are properly raised with an impeccably appropriate scheme.
In conclusion, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that true success only occurs when both conditions are present. Consequently, true brilliance requires a good set of genes as well as the right nurturing of that natural talent and hard work and dedication to one’s field.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport and music and others are not However it is sometimes clamed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or a musician Discuss both these vi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...ation of both is the key to success. Many claim that one set of genes outperforming oth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...imultaneously, principal factors for an individuals attainment are studying methodically an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a self-controlled manner" with adverb for "self-controlled"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lly and mastering specialized knowledge in a self-controlled manner. Take the case about violin geniuses as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31842105263 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22362620786 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3399068983 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.3125 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216627437857 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602047665043 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396178596162 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115307413442 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044265042594 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.