It is a good thing for people in senior management positions to get a higher salary than other workers in the same company To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is a good thing for people in senior management positions to get a higher salary than other workers in the same company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wide discrepancies in the salary between employees in senior management positions and ordinary workers have been becoming an ever-increasingly prevalent phenomenon. Some people advocate this kind of distribution system, and I agree with them since it is beneficial to the profits of companies.

That salaries and job status are in positive correlation can promote the financial benefits of companies by motivating employees to work desperately. In fact, this distribution system requires that leaders will get much more income than others. To get a higher income, employees have to requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities and be enthusiastic about their assignments so that they could be promoted. This increases the likelihood of better performance of the employees, leading to a higher financial profit of the company. A class example of this phenomenon is that there is always an elaborate career ladder, where leaders get higher salaries, in a competitive company.

Another positive effect this distribution system brings is to enhance the stability of leadership. A stable leadership is critically important for a company because leaders not only have proved their abilities but also known much valuable information about his company, some of which might even be the trade secret. However, if salaries for senior management positions are not attractive enough, leadership will be less likely to develop a sense of identity of his company and be more likely to be poached by rival firms. It is particularly common that many successful companies award employees in senior management positions shares of stock to guarantee the stability of leadership.

On balance, a relatively higher salary for leadership is reasonable because it provides more motivations for employees as well as more sense of identity for leadership.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-03-11 kimmy3 73 view
Essays by user kimmy3 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, in fact, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53380782918 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10448404777 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6230262611 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225292448511 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812376631831 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393523848982 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137301985319 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162257803703 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.