It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and gain better language skills than people watching TV. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people are considering that reading book has become a common measure in improving both the capable of visualisation and linguistic skills instead of just following programs on the television. In my view, I completely agree with this opinion and be about to show the explanations of my perspective.
To begin with, the capable of effectively reading books today is being indicated as one of the most significant indicators in evolving the power of imagination. With many kinds of beneficial books, there is a broad selection of opportunities for members possessing little fundamental knowledge of language to self-study and be accessible to the new language proactively. Besides, a huge number of linguists today are tending to carry out a wide range of immense studies regarding creating spectacular books which would be indispensable applications to aid as many as people, who have not been owning too much witness with a strange language, based on the actual records. As a result, by taking advantages of magnificent books, it would be easier for everyone to be able to visualize apparently the pathway of mastering a new language.
Additionally, because of the restricted details of programs on television, the positive aspects of reading book are likely to be far more significant with linguists in generating the inevitable prospects to reinforce their own knowledge, approaching advanced knowledge through the diversity of books. For instance, the latest studies of leading professors at the University of Melbourne pointed out that the ability to take place sophisticated project regarding linguistic was relatively soared after students had taken in accounts reading the huge amount of references relating primarily to other fields namely engineering, mathematics, science and so on, which support them to obtain a comprehensive knowledge.
In conclusion, I definitely believe that the habits of reading books would be able to provide us with intriguing benefits, better than watching television, concerning the power of imagination or in the progress of learning a foreign language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 89 | view |
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and gain better language skills than people watching TV. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Radio and Television audiences in UK, October - December 1992 67
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown belowYou should write at least 150 words. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 588, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... to aid as many as people, who have not been owning too much witness with a strange languag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'comprehensive knowledge'.
Suggestion: comprehensive knowledge
...and so on, which support them to obtain a comprehensive knowledge. In conclusion, I definitely believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, if, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4376899696 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19848993389 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61094224924 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.0748223734 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 198.777777778 106.682146367 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5555555556 20.7667163134 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2222222222 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129083859185 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517179782328 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340732870841 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807841193207 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297817345204 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.0946893788 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.