It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
Many opinions suppose that people who usually have a whale of a time by reading have more developments regarding imaginations and language skills than people consider watching TV as a preferrable choice. While I partly agree that the reading habit brings many benefits for people, I believe that movies also help people to promote some necessary skills.
On the one hand, it is clear that people who fall into the habit of reading do not only have better imaginations but also can improve language skills. Firstly, each book is compared to a source of raw materials, which humans use to produce their own world in the brain, and therefore, reading as much as possible gives an abundant amount of components to form vivid pictures by brains. For example, the work of literary fiction “Twenty Thousand Leagues Under The Sea” enables readers to imagine the scenery of the seafloor with many kinds of weird animals and plants and even terrible monsters. Secondly, people obviously can improve literate skills through reading books. It is undoubted that reading more helps us to understand complicated sentences better and know how to express our ideas in many ways instead of one or two conventional ways.
On the other hand, although movies have some limitations on improving humans’ creativity, watching TV is still considered as a beneficial activity for some reasons. Firstly, TV programmes provide audiences with a large amount of lastest news without paying an arm and a leg. For example, people can keep abreast of what is happening in the communities domestically and even internationally through leading articles and breaking news that is carried out on TV programmes every day. Secondly, movies enable people to enjoy an exciting world of vivid pictures and sounds. In a certain film, audiences can understand characters faster by her high pitch or his husky voice, so they are really useful to mimic and study a new language better.
In conclusion, while I agree that reading for pleasure can promote people’s creativity and language skills, I also believe that watching TV also is a good approach to know more about our planet and give us a better understanding about new tongues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-21 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | hungnguyen2712 | 61 | view |
- The diagram shows the process of producing smoked fish 89
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...a source of raw materials, which humans use to produce their own world in the brain...
^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mimic and study a new language better. In conclusion, while I agree that readin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08287292818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72428356613 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5037770776 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.538461538 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8461538462 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354241964723 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121579604819 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120282452474 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235169981612 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110436045553 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...a source of raw materials, which humans use to produce their own world in the brain...
^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mimic and study a new language better. In conclusion, while I agree that readin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08287292818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72428356613 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5037770776 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.538461538 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8461538462 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354241964723 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121579604819 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120282452474 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235169981612 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110436045553 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.