It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There has been some discussion about the existence and need of parks and squares in urban areas. While these open premises are believed to be extremely essential, others argue that these places make the land useless and they must be, hence, converted to practical purposes. In my opinion, despite the voices against the larger public places, parks and squares provide great value to both the towns and its civilians.
First and foremost, the expansive areas have always been considered as the heart of cities, where people get together for meetings and recreational activities. What's more, by spending quality time at these places, people are virtually able to relieve their stress and high pressure after their hectic daily schedules. For example, Vietnamese people usually get off work at 5 p.m, subsequently, they tend to visit here to meet their friends or just entertain themselves with some leisure activities. In addition, so significantly ideal are large outdoor public spaces that it can stimulate physical activities of rural residents who usually have sedentary lifestyles as well as do not have enough time to go to the gym. Consequently, there would be remarkable enhancements in both their mental and physical health.
In addition, one of the most powerful drivers of support for the significance of large outdoor public destinations is that they are one of the most wholesome places, encompassing the salubrious climate, tranquil as well as clean space surrounded a plenty of trees. It can prevent us from many serious kinds of pollution, which pose a detrimental threat to our lives. For instance, the crown jewel of city parks, Central Park in New York is the best urban oasis in the world which make a strong impression on people by a botanical garden, various ponds, skating rinks and more and providing a breath of fresh air from city life.
In conclusion, when it comes to the issue regarding public outdoor facilities, I would like to support constructing facilities since people living in the city would owe places to do anything they want and also make the cities fresher and the environment is remarkably improved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-23 | jennienie | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-24 | hoangteo0103 | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
- Many people say that we have developed in a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To what degree you agree with this opinion 89
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d its civilians. First and foremost, the expansive areas have always been con...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...r meetings and recreational activities. Whats more, by spending quality time at these...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of pollution, which pose a detrimental threat to our lives. For instance, the c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, regarding, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72179245252 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623931623932 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7297444067 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211526744674 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06537129372 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056001924408 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113241821283 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109423899171 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.