Many people say that we have developed in a throw-away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. To what degree you agree with this opinion?
With the advance of technology and living standards, it is commonly believed that the more a wealth of plastic bags and garbage discharged into our surroundings without completely disintegrating experiences, the more developing a disposal culture becomes. To some extent, i strongly concur with this notion.
First and foremost, it cannot be denied that the demand of using plastic bags and non-durable products is remarkably increasing; consequently, it has led to the development of a throw-away society. By the virtue of their convenience, people tend to use them in lieu of other ones. Furthermore, if a consumer buys even mere types of item, for instance, some fruits or flowers, he or she usually asks for at least two plastic bags in order to avoid some problems which may happen in their way to home. Subsequently, virtually does she or he not intend to employ them anymore. Additionally, people frequently dump many products which are still in a good condition and perfectly functional to purchase the latest version of things as well. In other words, an amount of short-term objects discharged into the environment is more massive and supplanted by novel ones.
In addition, one of the most powerful drivers of support for the advance of consumerism is that more and more factories have excessively manufactured a number of short-lived products with low-price for encouraging consumers to purchase. These goods, for individuals, have become cheaper to use than reuse. Also, as the market is flooded with plastic bags and disposal products, people have plenty of option to select. For example, it enables consumers to choose various type of plastic bags or boxes containing instant food, which are different from the ones for drinking, otherwise. In other words, then come the abundant utilization of plastic bags or items in modern days, as each bag is in accordance with specific stuff contained.
In conclusion, filling up our surroundings with so many plastic bags or disposal waste will not only lead to the development of a throw away society but also render the dire consequences such as posing a threat into the environment, overconsumption,... Therefore, people should take action to reduce it gradually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | quynhhuong656 | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | JackSk13 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | JackSk13 | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | jennienie | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | hoangteo0103 | 85 | view |
- Many people say that we have developed in a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To what degree you agree with this opinion 89
- It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public spaces such as squares and parks Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'intends'.
Suggestion: intends
...sequently, virtually does she or he not intend to employ them anymore. Additionally, p...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...at into the environment, overconsumption,... Therefore, people should take action ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2061281337 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04738176824 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593314763231 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.854133736 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7333333333 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247228529888 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775684125221 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724335135932 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1621581991 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621088622104 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.