It is important for all towns and cities to have large outdoor public space such as squares and sparks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There has been some discussion about the existence and need of parks and squares in urban areas. While some people believe that these open premises are essential, others insist that these places make the land useless and hence they must be converted to practical purposes. In my opinion, despite the voices against the larger public places, parks and squares provide great value to both the towns and its civilians.
First of all, the public areas have always been considered as the heart of cities, where people get together for meetings and leisure activities. Besides that, children and their parents spend quality time at these places after their hectic schedules. Moreover, such places attract tourists as thaey usually have a history behind their creation. For instance, all European towns are famous for their beautiful gardens and city center squares. Thus, it is absolutely imperative to conserve them for the future generations.
On the other hand, one can not deny the fact that cities are getting crowded each day and lacking places to build public and commercial centers. New transportation systems coming to the cities and they need a large space to construct stations and wider lanes. For example, New York was planned nearly two hundred years ago and the roads in the city were small and narrow which were built for carts not for cars and buses. Later, New York city authorities converted many historical parks and gardens into parking stations and highways. Therefore, destroying park and other public place is the useful solution for space constraints in the cities.
In conclusion, big public grounds are the need of our future generations. Cities are facing a lot of pressure to develop a substantial infrastructure for the growing population, but this can not be allowed at the cost of parks and squares. It is completely indispensable to have huge social place in the urban areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09584664537 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5331373633 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1820990614 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221346373553 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683072833402 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449078305813 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12161639178 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393124566446 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.