Nowadays more and more people think that it is necessary for children to tell right and wrong. some poeple argue that punishment is a good method of teaching them this distinction. But others donot think so. My firm conviction is that children should learn the difference between right and wrong, but not by punishing them.
On the one hand, punishment might have a negative influence on children`s physical and psychological development. Psysically, punishment might cause any hurt on their body. Mentally, punishment from their teachers and parents might make they suffer from metal and emotional pressure and stress that might make they so scary and unconfident when making friends or getting along with others.
On the another hand, punishment might make our society unhealter. The child will be our future. If punishment affect badly children`s growth and development, they might donot behave well so that there might be more criminals and violence in the society. Finally, if that happened, we would live in a unhealthy and undevelopment society.
From my point of view, there are lots of efficient ways to teach children about the difference between right and wrong rather than pushing them. Tell some stories about right and wrong, rewarding them for good heaviour and correcting when they make mistakes are good ways to achieve this. Of course, it might be helpful to teach them piack up rubbish they have dropped, clean up graffiti they haved drawn or apologise to someone they have hurt. Those efficient methods will lead better future behavior than does punishment.
Finally, to help the children learn the difference between right and wrong, teachers and parents have a responsibility to provide good role modeling in their own behaviour. Only by taking good ways can they teach children efficiently.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 58
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...y for children to tell right and wrong. some poeple argue that punishment is a good ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lly, if that happened, we would live in a unhealthy and undevelopment society. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2662116041 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70940754331 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6293015165 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7647058824 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17647058824 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236898060893 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828847408221 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871373593564 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148033306203 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898371467613 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.