A controversy has been raised surrounded the issue whether punishment should be applied as an essential mean in educating children. I take the view against such an idea.
When it comes to right and wrong, it relates to manner, behavior and moral. I strongly believe that punishment is an immoral way of guiding young child. It is said that many parents have employed harsh punishments, including psychologically aggressive and physically violent to coach their children of what is right and what is not. These are not only considered as violence against children, but also improper ways of teaching the young how to behave. By means, using such severe punishments is not suitable in the case.
In reality, some sanctions affect children psychologically, causing the adverse effects. The young was influenced by the penalties, and started to bully their peer. As a result, punishments are not a successful solution for youngsters to distinct the right and wrong since it brings up more violence. These measures have a tremendous impact on the young, and can hardly be alleviated.
However, I deem that minor sanctions such as detention or grounded can be applied in certain situations where a youngster disobeys or rebels. While being grounded or getting a detention, parents and teachers can administer the rules and boost children to learn or do homework without playing video games. Cutting down money or phone is another non-extreme measure that could be applied. By virtue of such, a child can rectify the mistakes and avoiding replicating bad actions.
In sum, although punishments are inappropriate, but to some certain extent, parents and teachers can consider using some approximate minor punishments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25547445255 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93728287157 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.844039118 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193455518354 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054655294844 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500493359491 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100714840903 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396138145799 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.