It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages

It is said that undertaking hazards plays a vital role in people's professional and private lives. Although this has some drawbacks, i believe that the negative impacts of this are overshadowed by many of its adverse influences.
Taking risks is considered as disadvantageous to people on account of some reasons. Firstly, accepting dangers can lead to economic loss, after which people have to face with mental crisis. A telling example is about investors who want to boost their economy by spending their money or property on different projects. However, when the trend goes against their estimation, they will be driven to the verge of bankruptcy. Therefore, in some cases, the relationships around them are affected such as friendships or family. Secondly, people who pursue their all time favorite jobs may encounter high rate of death or injury if their occupations are dangerous. Athletes sacrifice for their career and fame, workers working with machines go through the risk of being injured to bring home the bacon are also typical examples.
On the contrary, facing downsides brings people many merits despite the disadvantages mentioned above. One of the main benefits is the ability to tackle the issues and grasp the opportunities. After losing money, people will be more contious of what they invest in and avoid being put in jeopardy, with prosperity being brought to better their lives. Another dominance is the feeling of victory, which emerges after completing tough challenge. For instance, if they take up an extreme sport, they will have a whale of adventurous time.
Inconclusion, taking dangers works both ways, but i believe that the benificial effects that it brings eclipse the drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is said that undertaking hazards play...
^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ives. Although this has some drawbacks, i believe that the negative impacts of th...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by many of its adverse influences. Taking risks is considered as disadvanta...
^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding relationships'?
Suggestion: the surrounding relationships
...f bankruptcy. Therefore, in some cases, the relationships around them are affected such as friendships or fam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the bacon are also typical examples. On the contrary, facing downsides brings...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill have a whale of adventurous time. Inconclusion, taking dangers works both ...
^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...on, taking dangers works both ways, but i believe that the benificial effects tha...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in some cases, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24363636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77617728731 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0484695748 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230564626404 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687783273317 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650830796126 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115029922775 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720465577582 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.