It is impossible to help all people in the world, so government should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that government support solely be concentrated on satisfying domestic needs. Although I understand that provide aid for everyone in the world is unachievable, I disagree with this belief.
On the one hand, I suppose the world’s leaders difficulties of provision international aids to deprived regions is legitimate. Firstly, it is unfeasible for government’s support to reach all of the undeprivileged as their number is enormous in many separated places around the globe and the types of support they need also various. Secondly, while state budget in one country is limited, many governments even are struggling with domestic problems, well-being of their citizens and stablelize their economy and politics should be prioritized. The government may need to consider carefully before carrying out any acts of global assistance.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that any government should assume the responsibility of helping citizens in other countries within ability to contribute. Especially with the trend of globalization, assistance inhabitants in other countries, to some extents, is synonymous to support people in the home country. For instance, in 2020 when pandemic COVID 19 happened and spread in more than 200 nations, although Vietnam is a developing country only, Vietnam deliveried aids to US, Japan and other countries hundred thousand medical mask to share difficulties with people who live beyond national border, in which there are many Vietnamese citizens also are working or studying abroad. In addition, the act of supporting people all around the world enhance cooperation and relationship among countries. It may promote a sense of humanity simultaneously, which is essential to the sustainable development of the world because humanity is the foundation of peace and stability.
In conclusion, I truly believe the world leaders should be lend their neighbors a hand to help those people, who are in need. National boundaries should not stop us from this obligation. A small donation to an international charity might have a great impact in our community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
- The dangers and complexities of modern world have mobile phone an absolute necessity for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example Do you think is a positive or negative development 80
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that it is better for people to be unemployed than people to be employed but they do not enjoy To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the future, it is expected that there will be higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sible for government’s support to reach all of the undeprivileged as their number is enorm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...d aids to US, Japan and other countries hundred thousand medical mask to share difficul...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lent'?
Suggestion: lent
...uly believe the world leaders should be lend their neighbors a hand to help those pe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47256097561 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13949049688 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5208161577 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.214285714 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216023890632 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672919916109 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417453657413 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117088894536 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342996675196 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.