It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the growth of globalization, many people need foreign assistance. However, some believe that it is not viable to provide aids to all people in the world, and therefore national leaders should exclusively help residents of their own country. While there are several benefits behind oversea assistance, I agree with this viewpoint.
There are compelling reasons why the provision of international aids plays a vital role in a certain extent. Firstly, many underdeveloped countries' governments cannot guarantee a good living standard for their inhabitant. For example, in Africa countries, national leaders are incapable of combating with burdens of domestic proverty due to terrorism or corruption, they need involvement of economically advantaged powerhouses such as America in eradicating these pressing issues. Secondly, global assistance from developed countries also have a great influence on shifting local residents' mind. More specifically, if governments take actions to help peope overseas, their residents will idolize the idea of self-devotion towards a better world.
However, I am convinced that authorities should concentrate to their residents' life due to some rationales. Firstly, governments may encounter obstacles when they help people overseas. For instance, they will face with difficulties in term of transportation when sending food and medicines to the underpreviledged who suffer from famine and critical diseases. Moreover, when governments allocate funds to help foreign people, resources to tackle national problems may be sadly lacking. Therefore, they should prioritise the well-being of their citizens and stablize their economy and politics before carrying out any acts of global assistacne.
In conclusion, despite of necessity of international aids, I maintain that focusing on local residents is more practical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | kienbanhkem | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | lehonganh1212 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers Others people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more To what extent do you argee or disagree with this viewpoint 78
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same schools Others however believe that girls achieve better results when educated in single sex schools Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88847583643 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18755838558 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650557620818 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.293104731 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242195309781 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759138605423 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662734789731 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129925502024 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697350148413 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88847583643 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18755838558 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650557620818 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.293104731 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242195309781 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759138605423 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662734789731 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129925502024 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697350148413 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.