The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie charts compare two nations in terms of the populations in three different age groups in the year 2000 and predictions for 2050.
Overall, the populations of both Italy and Yemen in the 0-14-year group are likely to decrease whereas a falling trend can be seen in the over 60 years old during the 50-year-period. In addition, Italy is also predicted that its residents in the age of over 60 years will be dramatically higher than that of Yemen.
In 2000, the percentage of 0-14-year-old residents in Yemen accounted for 50,1%, compared to 14,3% of Italy. And the figure for Italian citizens aged 15-59 made up 61,6%, which was slightly higher than the figure of Yemen, with 46,3%. It is also noticeable that Italians in the age of over 60 years were nearly 8 times much more than that of Yemen.
In 2050, while the proportion of those aged 15-59 in Yemen is projected to rise to 57,3%, the figure for Italy is likely to drop to 46,2%. For 0-14-year-olds, there will be decreases of about 13% in Yemen and just over 3% in Italy. In regards to over 60 age group, Italians and the population of Yemen are predicted to increase nearly double to 42,3% and 5,7% respectively.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others however think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinio 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 11
- the global sales of 5 mobile phone brands 73
- REDUCING TRAFFIC JAMS Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others however think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...13% in Yemen and just over 3% in Italy. In regards to over 60 age group, Italians and the pop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65714285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67152618445 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9309706871 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302389984463 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144266329083 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717871150429 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214528285259 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680664165939 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.