In this day and age, there are an increase of people who are calling for help, but it is definitely hard for any specific organizations to handle with all of the world population. Hence a new method has been estalished is to encourage the government to just concentrate on their residents and citizens. As far as I am concerned, I completely agree with this solution and I also believe this will lead to a prettier world.
To begin, helping more than 7 billion people is absolutely impossible for everyone. The reason to explain this is there are many who sill cannot afford for their life, so it is no evidence to persuade them to help the others. Furthermore, the populationis continue to increase over days due to new born babies or emigration, so even if you are the riches person in the world, supporting people is still limited. For instance, Bill Gates is always go on the charityto provide food and drinks for people who are living an a breadline but the number of them is unsignificantly. In addition, people must to accept and understand the truth.
Thus, governments of that country should priotirize their popuation than any other foreigners. To be more specific, any aspects such as health or school, the state should help people to reduce the weakness and word-blinders, so the economic will be increased some ways. Moreover, people in a particular country are living under the responsibilities of the principles, so it correlates to the protection and cares from higher position people. Last but not least, helping small communities will also result in larger society later. Thus, maybe in the next 10 or 20 years, the word "impossible" which is displayed in this essay, will be transfer to "possible".
To conclude, serving the domestic citizens should be the first target of governments if they want to live in a better environment, due to some enlisted reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y specific organizations to handle with all of the world population. Hence a new method ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...andle with all of the world population. Hence a new method has been estalished is to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a sill'.
Suggestion: who is a sill
...eason to explain this is there are many who sill cannot afford for their life, so it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'riches'' or 'rich's'?
Suggestion: riches'; rich's
...s or emigration, so even if you are the riches person in the world, supporting people ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...ted. For instance, Bill Gates is always go on the charityto provide food and drink...
^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...od and drinks for people who are living an a breadline but the number of them is uns...
^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...is unsignificantly. In addition, people must to accept and understand the truth. Th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.965625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16689263859 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2387381478 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282068074527 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091015046936 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438286149288 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146151296494 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569664667107 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.