It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people think that traditional cultures will be disappeared someday in the future because of technology development. And both of them also cannot come along. Like a battle, just one and only one team survives. In my point of view, I totally disagree with it.
One thing, technology development can help us remain traditional cultures better. With high technology, all ancient architectures will be recovered effectively almost intact. Thanks to that, young generations can visit and learn about their long history. We also know that no matter how strong a building is, but after a long time being affected by weather and the external environment, these structures will still be rotten and damaged if we do not check or maintain regularly. Therefore, technology is really a wonderful thing to assist us in the preservation of these historic sites.
Another thing, as technology becomes more and more powerful, the dissemination of traditional cultures and arts becomes easier. It is also easier for other countries to grasp the cultural features of a country faster and more conveniently. Especially those who like to travel and explore but the conditions do not allow can learn these new things through technology. Not only that, but it also helps to encourage current generations to protect and maintain traditional cultures. From there, they will be forever with time and not be lost no matter how modern life is. People today will always remember their roots most deeply. Hence, these two types: traditional culture and technological development can go together and support each other.
Summary, traditional culture will still exist under the strong development of technology. Also, we should believe that technology is making things better, not making the old culture vanish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | Tran Bao Long | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Alonejourney | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | lilyngan | 89 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, still, therefore, another thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29929577465 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84587868522 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0825151992 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6111111111 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61111111111 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361823698517 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107890125182 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884642898887 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234807181737 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229291211414 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.