Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that government should focus on improving railways than roads. Although two kinds of transportations are both important, I also feel railways is more important and we need to spend more money on it.
Why is road important? Because it has lots of benefits you also know. First, when we use road, we ourselves can decide where and when we go, when we stop. It’s really convenient and make us more comfortable with each trip, especially in short roads. For example, when you want to go to Long Khanh from Xuan Loc, you can use motorbike to go there right away without waiting anything. It just takes a half an hour. Second, it’s about the speed. You certainly know that railway is faster than roads so going sightseeing many beautiful places and take photos by railways will be more difficult.
Road is important like that but railway is more important. There are some reasons proving this idea. One thing, using railways will help you save time when moving from this place to another place as it is faster. For instance, you are going to go to Nam Dinh province from Xuan Loc, you generally take a coach to go there. And it will take two days one night. It is a long road and you will be tired with that. Now, let’s change to railway. Is it long like that? Not at all. With this means, you just spend about one day and one night. Your trip will be shorter and easier. Another thing, you do not have to be got stuck and wait for long hours to get to your wanted place. Moreover, you always feel cool and comfortable since there is air-conditioning in each train.
To sum up, government should use more money on railways than roads. With railway, our living will be faster, more convenient and easily. It helps us improve not only our living condition but also our economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-25 | NinaBei | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | HappyCandy | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | necromancer2610 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | HappyCandy | 78 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e money on it. Why is road important? Because it has lots of benefits you also know. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, another thing, for example, for instance, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53538461538 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33713322598 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547692307692 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.547228642 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.6923076923 106.682146367 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5 20.7667163134 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22982737622 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633006280399 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684608767172 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155745059567 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308086765025 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.2 13.0946893788 47% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 50.2224549098 169% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 11.3001002004 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.16 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.58950901804 74% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.