In our contemporary life, in some regions, the loss of some traditional cultures are claimed to be caused by technological advancement. In other words, an enormous group of people believe that technology and cultures are totally inconsistent and cannot exist coincidently. In my opinion, I do agree that modern technology has a huge impact on cultural development, however, I reckon that cultural evolution can be thrust by using technology precisely.
On the one hand, the current technology wave is increasing all over the world and menace the traditional progress in some areas. Accordingly, people, especially youngsters nowadays always desire to possess state-of-the-art equipment such as smartphones, laptops to reveal their wealth and their temperament. As a result, some kind of ancient and old-fashioned materials which associate with a population revolution will lose their attractiveness and gradually be made redundant. In that way, technology will increasingly monopolize public awareness and deteriorate cultural enhancement.
Nevertheless, we can exploit the prominence of technological and virtual platforms to promote and widespread a country's traditional cultures. To be more specific, cultural content creators should probably use Youtube or Facebook to publicize their national cultures towards the globe. For instance, Liquizi, formerly known as a Chinese youtuber who has a comprehensive understanding of Chinese cultures and design remarkable sort of videos that engage the world with her country's valuable and respectful tradition.
Eventually, I do not refute the damaging effects of contemporary technology on ancient cultures. However, I ensure that by using technological applicants wisely and appropriately in parallel with excitement and dedication towards honourable traditions, we can facilitate our life and also preserve our origins.
In conclusion, I agree that technology will restrict cultural existence except that we combine them properly.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 67
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nsistent and cannot exist coincidently. In my opinion, I do agree that modern tech...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96153846154 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38468943166 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8912913694 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.153846154 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356567276191 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127461388071 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718066740483 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196886343002 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753830998334 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.