It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the extinction of animals are normal, human interference in the phenomenon is thus meaningless. I mostly disagree with the notion as the majority of animals have their roles in the ecosystem, albeit there are certain exceptions.
There are two main merits of safeguarding survial of animals. The first point in support of this view is that animal kingdom provides human with valuable genes. It is common that humanity extract byproducts from animals to serve for human’s well-being. Their uses can come in forms of chemical compounds, food, and bones which can be utilized as medicines, accessories, or production inputs of other industrial products. Another justification for intervening the disappearance of animals is to sustain the ecological equilibrium. Some living creatures may not have economic benefits or applications in pharmaceutical and manufacturing industries. They, however, are the beating heart of the existence of other species. Flys, the insects that are often associated with diseases and filth, contribute greatly to natural balance by facilitating decomposing process of organic compounds which creates the breeding ground for a plethora of flora and fauna.
Admittedly, there are animals whose appearance are at odds with other creatures. Ticks, the blood suckers which thrive on other species could examplify the phenomenon. The parasites transmitting pathogen and sucking the blood of wild and domesticated animals, while have little positive implications on the animals and the nature as a whole. However, animals bring more harm than good like ticks are few. Protection of animals against natural selection are still of primary importance.
In sum, I mainly object to the idea that preservation of fauna is furtile. Even though certain species are a bane of human’s life, most of animals are worth protection of homo sapien.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
- Government should fund scientific research rather than commercial organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Forests are the lungs of the earth Destruction of the world s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 11
- As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the animals') or simply say ''most animals''.
Suggestion: most of the animals; most animals
...ain species are a bane of human’s life, most of animals are worth protection of homo sapien.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00468322526 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.041110081 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161413583771 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463044575937 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341611586562 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914837415273 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023210438038 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.