Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
Increase of food waste is becoming an alarming concern in recent years. There are two main causes and several merits could be taken to takle the issue, which will be elaborated below.
Improvement in the material life and the prevalence of social media platforms are two main reasons behind the increasing amount of food waste these days. As the global economy is booming in recent years and humans are becoming more weathier, people tend to leave more food than in the past. This is rooted in the fact that when people are less well-off, they attempt to save their expenditure by avoid reckless buying behaviors, and food is often bought with just adequate quantity which is opposed to consumerism lifestyle for the time being. In addition, the affect of social media such as Facebook or Instagram also contribute to the increment of food waste. This stems from the fact that young people, the most active user group on the internet, tend to excessively buy food for showcasing their extravagant lifestyle. These people often buy in order to follow new trend, thereby posting video, pitures on social platforms. Thus, people are not burdened with the shortage of food like in the past.
To ameliorate the negative impacts of increasing leftover food, there should be the interference of governments through social campaigns to raise awareness of the public. Political leaders should run videos to educate people about the economical and environmental affects when people leave a great amount of food behind. Young people should be educated to eat up their portion and order enough food. Finally, people should be told about the link between saving the planet and their eating habit.
In sum, better standard of living and wispread use of internet cause trash from food increasing. The authorities should launch programmes to mitigate the trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | mytinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | giangngoc | 82 | view |
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 89
- The use of social media may replace face to face contact Do advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, thus, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08223684211 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48800576715 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.185567226 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895144414098 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318872590177 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252657807104 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488191566129 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270452909761 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.