It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Agree or disagree?
It is sometimes believed that there is no convincing reasons that people should prevent fauna from being extincted in nature. This essay strongly disagree with this suggestion as now will be discussed.
First and foremost, natural factors have significant impact on the number of wild animals. As a matter of fact, serious disaster can be affected the cycle life of the animals. For example, volcanic eruption appeared a long time ago killing millions of creatures in the earth. Additionally, illegal hunting which significantly affect the population of wild animals around the world. This is because in many undeveloped countries, people want to buy animal's skins like tigers or lions in order to decorate for their houses, rooms which lead to the decrease in number of rare animals in the wild.
In recent years, with the development of industry can also have huge impact on the life of the fauna. In big city, take Ho Chi Minh city for example, in order to adapt the housing demand of the citizens, the government have to cut down trees to make way for building houses, apartments. As a result, many wild animals lose their habitats which can lead to the fact the they do not have home to live. Furthermore, if deforestation continue to happen for a long time, many wild animals can be extincted. Accordingly, the government not only should launch awareness campaign but also have to prevent these activities.
In conclusion, I totally disagree that natural process makes the wild animals become extinct and human do not need to be responsible for given the aforementioned arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | LenhungSpeakingandWriting | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | tranlequihoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | tranlequihoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | tranlequihoang | 78 | view |
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...eir habitats which can lead to the fact the they do not have home to live. Furthermore, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74024110697 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0323833412 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263316455812 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859947959507 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839730926219 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179000594581 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786758060755 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.