It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct(e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos,..). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, the problems related to rare species have been a subject of debate. Some argue that due to the natural extinction of some animal species like Dodos, people do not need to protect them from dying out. Personally, I disagree with this notion and this essay will give some reason for my opinion.
To begin with, human activities cause numerous impacts on wild animals, so people should have responsibility for conserving them. In fact, many animals in the red list like Koala and Panda are poached and held in captivity with an aim to sell their body parts in black market. As a result, these species gradually disappear, which makes them on the verge of extinction. Therefore, the government needs to have drastic measures like imposing stricter punishments and heavy fined on poachers to prevent these illegal behaviours from increasing.
Moreover, wild animals also play an important role in maintaining ecosystem balance closely related to human life. In agriculture, for example, if bees or butterflies vanish completely, pollination will not be done, which leads to many kinds of plants not maintaining their breed. Thus, the government should raise citizens’ awareness about the importance of animal species against their life. Consequently, people are more likely to protect them and minimize many activities affecting the natural habitat such as deforestation. In addition, wildlife sanctuaries need to be constructed to provide animal species, especially endangered species, safe shelters. The most compelling evidence is Cuc Phuong National Park in Vietnam used to conserve animals in the red list.
In conclusion, animal species are significant in ecosystem balance attached with human life and human activities have detrimental impacts on wildlife. Therefore, people should take actions to protect them from extinction
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should be government pay more money on improving public transportation What is your opinion 73
- Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve the problems 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82610072759 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1951289697 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216665516358 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710405473353 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555780701416 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142568437914 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575372123459 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82610072759 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1951289697 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216665516358 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710405473353 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555780701416 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142568437914 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575372123459 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.