It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is agrue that a natural process for animal species to become extinct such as dinosaurs, dodos and some types of tiger, but many individuals believe that there is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. From my point of view, i mostly agree with this notion because of its disadvantage. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
At first, the rare animal species is hugely significant function for the development of each nation and social. Not only will the eco-systerm become more diversity, but also international relationship friends and aboad teenagers will be attracted by this animal species. Furthermore, the enviroment and atmosphere will become more terrible, if there are more animal become extinct. Horrible disaster will appear more frequency such as vocano, tsunami and earthquark. To illustrate, at 1800s in vietnam after the extinction of helpful insect, the production of vietnamese people in that years had reduced significantly and the citizens life becom more difficual.
However, the government need to balance revenue between developing contri and protecting rare animal from happening, both of them should be improve together. A numerous hamful animal with human habit and enviroment such as mosquito, grasshopper and some nagative insect should be detroyed by modern technology or new medthod, making them become extinct.
To conclude, by my agrument from these essay that i totally disagree with this statement since animal species have various benefits for our activity, so goverment need to have bright plan to surviv rare animal for development of the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some experts believe that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens any more satisfied To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will analyse this statement in detail. At first, the rare animal species is hug...
^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...years had reduced significantly and the citizens life becom more difficual. However,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e citizens life becom more difficual. However, the government need to balance ...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improved'?
Suggestion: improved
... from happening, both of them should be improve together. A numerous hamful animal with...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... medthod, making them become extinct. To conclude, by my agrument from these e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38671875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7791177527 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.233673693 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362007947351 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124488526989 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131742008767 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216270413464 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135406223824 0.056905535591 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.