It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some that the extinction of animals is a natural phenomenon and humans have no responsibility to deter this from happening. From my perspective, I am completely against this viewpoint as people must be accountable for what they have impacted negatively on the wild environment to protect fauna as well as maintain ecosystem balance which is directly related to human life.
To commence with, humans are partly responsible for various disappearances of animal species. Although history records that many wild beasts, such as dinosaurs or dodos, went extinct from cataclysmic climate changes before human intervention, a greater proportion of species are on the verge of extinction or no longer extant as a result of human activities nowadays. Indeed, mass deforestation to build infrastructure or harvest timber, overhunting, and pollution due to industrial wastes have cost wild animals their living habitats, leading to food source depletion and eventually, demise. To illustrate, Australia's recent wildfires have **pushed around 100 species closer to extinction and in Africa**, many species such as rhinos /ˈraɪ.noʊ/ or elephants are hunted for their body parts. Therefore, humans, as conscious stewards of the earth, should be under a moral obligation to the detrimental impacts of their activities on wildlife.
Another aspect is that conserving endangered fauna is imperative as the loss of a species could disrupt the ecosystem balance on the Earth which leading some disadvantages to human life. Since all living organisms’ existence in a habitat is interrelated, once a species succumbs to extinction, other animals that depend on it will be affected and eventually die, resulting in a lack of biodiversity. Consequently, this can cause potential damage to the nature-based economy. For instance, in 2013, the sunflower starfish in Northern California declined in number due to disease, thus causing its prey - the purple sea urchins to flourish. This sudden proliferation has damaged the red urchins’ population and also exhausted a great source of sushi, which resulted in a slump in the area’s economy. Moreover, some animal species may possess unique genetic traits that are resistant to some ailments so if they disappear, people lose the opportunity to study them to pave the way for breakthroughs in medicine, biotechnology, and other scientific domains.
In conclusion, although it is recorded that some animal species underwent extinction due to unpreventable natural impacts, it cannot be denied that it is humans that mostly pose a threat to the wildlife environment nowadays. Therefore, I still would take the view that people should conserve endangered animals as it not only is an ethical duty but also maintains humanity's benefits from nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4837962963 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13029735446 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585648148148 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4905397343 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.933333333 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200259504495 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682511472048 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516201483624 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130969356292 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259576545856 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.