It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?"
The natural course of evolution has seen numerous species come and go, including the iconic dinosaurs. Some argue that it is a futile endeavor for humans to interfere with this natural process and prevent the extinction of animal species. Despite acknowledging the logic behind this suggestion, I firmly disagree with it for several reasons.
Proponents of non-intervention argue that extinction is an inherent part of the evolutionary cycle. They contend that species, including dinosaurs, faced natural selection pressures that led to their demise, making it a fundamental aspect of the Earth's ecological processes. Attempting to prevent such extinctions, according to this view, interferes with the natural order of the planet, meaning that it can cause more disadvantages rather than offering any practical benefit. They further argue that all efforts spent on conserving endangered species may not guarantee desired outcomes while demanding exorbitant expenses that can be allocated to more pressing issues.
Nevertheless, I strongly believe that we should take immediate action to address the issue for reasons related to human impacts and the values that endangered species can offer. Regarding the former, the impact of human activities, such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change, has accelerated the rate of species extinction, affecting biodiversity and potentially causing a domino effect on other interconnected species. Humans, as conscious stewards of the planet, have a moral obligation to mitigate the impacts of their actions and preserve the diversity of life. Another significant aspect is that endangered species often possess unique genetic traits which should be studied thoroughly to pave the way for breakthroughs in medicine, biotechnology, and other scientific domains. For instance, a species might have developed resistance to certain diseases, which could inform medical research and contribute to the development of new treatments.
In conclusion, while the natural process of extinction has been a recurring phenomenon throughout Earth's history, I would take the view that we should intervene with it to save threatened species. Preventing the extinction of animal species is not only an ethical imperative but also crucial for groundbreaking discoveries that can greatly benefit humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77971014493 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10238913025 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7731279976 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.428571429 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164150703441 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564486839255 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404333087163 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10909630927 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446009950582 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.