It is neither possible nor useful for the government to provide university places for a large proportion of students.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that offering opportunities to study at universities to a larger number of students is impossible as well as useless for goverments. I completely agree with this statement because of enormous expenditure compared to its negligible benefits.
First of all, the authorities' spending on education could increase significantly as they have to invest more into facilities and coverage of tuition fee's shortage. Each university has fixed capacity to offer in-person classes, therefore, the more students study the more demand of infrastructure needs which leads to a burden for gevernments to cover. In addition, raising the proportion of students studying at universities can indirectly increase the amount of exemption cases in education system and this expenditure usually paid by goverments. As a result, it is impossible for the governments to cover all of that cost.
Secondly, increasing number of higher-education student may not be as useful as some peole believe due to the nature of universities itself. It is a choice of people to pursue highe level of education, so offering these people the opportunities of studying at universities is inefficient and does not brings back any values. Furthermore, highschool graduates is still a important workforce in societies besides of universities' graduates and the surplus of the later labor force can lead to harmful impacts to a nation rather than positive effects.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree to the statement of providing universities places for larger number of students as it can be impposible to conduct due to limited budget of the government and little benefits it brings back to societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-06 | Nguyen Hung | 61 | view |
- Some universities are offering online courses as an alternative to classes delivered in campus Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Some people think that too much money and too many resources have been given to the protection of wild animals Do you agree or disagree 73
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bring'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: bring
...niversities is inefficient and does not brings back any values. Furthermore, highschoo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...niversities is inefficient and does not brings back any values. Furthermore, highschoo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...thermore, highschool graduates is still a important workforce in societies beside...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43129770992 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25509869311 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576335877863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2780075722 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.3 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215172823999 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844490710868 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648161211719 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137354906423 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547138076056 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.