It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young
people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a knowledge-based society, there is a notion that university education can guarantee students' career prospect. However, it is lately perceived that providing university or tertiary education for the majority of students are impossible and useless. While this thinking is valid to a certain, I only agree to half of the statement as university is quite beneficial to high school graduates.
To begin with, university is certainly useful since it enables students to live in an environment where they can accumulate knowledge in various fields and students are provided with much deeper knowledge than they did in high school. Furthermore, students can also enhance their practical skills such as interpersonal and teamworking skills through group project assigned in university, such skills are believed to be extremely useful for working in the future. Additionally, their friend circle can get expanded considering that students are exposed to new relationships in university. Moreover, having formal qualifications such as a bachelor’s degree or even a doctoral degree, can guarantee one’s career prospect and job opportunities.
Despite the benefits that university education may bring, providing tertiary education for a massive number of students are impossible considering the exorbitant cost. Plus, the numbers of university are insufficient for all the students to attend since the number of high school graduates are increasing annually. For instance, in Vietnam, there are approximately one million of high school graduates this year and the figure has been growing consistently. Also, in some case, there are students who are experiencing an unfortunate life as they are financially unstable to pursue tertiary education and have to do part-time jobs to cover their living expenses.
In conclusion, although university are quite necessary and advantageous for students as they create more employment opportunities, supplying entry to a high proportion of young people are unfeasible on many levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
- The diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other items with famous brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 89
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
...ct and job opportunities. Despite the benefits university may bring, providing univers...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59856630824 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16928985679 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534050179211 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.5083617395 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171799969631 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777492198575 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051567319713 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125141872459 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393523585691 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.