It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people
It is argued that it is impossible and useless to offer tertiary education for a tremendous number of young. Personally, I partly disagree with this statement.
There are many reasons to explain why having a university degree has a vital role in the future of young people in this knowledge-based society. Firstly, this is because higher education provides students with more job opportunities in the fiercely competitive market, which leads to the reduction of the unemployment rate in the country. In addition to this, when people have the financial stability to meet their essential needs, the well-being of those also improved. Secondly, the university also offers a dynamic environment to train the faculty of the young generation. During in period of pursuing further education, people have more chances of enhancing their practical skills by participating in extracurricular activities such as communication, team-work skills. For instance, joining clubs helps the young broaden their social relationships, which is key to the ladder of success in later life.
It is, however, impossible to provide almost all young people with access to tertiary education. Firstly, it has the possibility of wasting money in many developing countries. If most people are well-educated by the university, the government have to allocate their huge financial resources in building school places, while there are many aspects of life need to be invested in, such as infrastructures, pollution issues. Secondly, equipping people with higher education may increase the risk of imbalance in the workforce because these people are likely to choose high paying jobs. This leads in the absence of manual labours such as workers, plumbers.
In conclusion, for many reasons I have mentioned above, I still hold my initial view that although making way for most people to follow further education has many benefits, it is not possible to happen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governmets must invest this money in public services instead. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39735099338 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0330420912 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9605145833 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208687614725 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692931392795 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461280233914 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122891545099 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271613668252 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.