It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the present day, each individual has various distinct perspectives about their working lives. Some people argued that it is not pragmatically for someone to not shift their firm and owner for their entire time. I, personally, concur with this statement because humans need to switch for their evolution and this essay will address the explanations for my views as follows.
To begin with, there are several compelling reasons why workers do not remain in one enterprise permanently. Staff members do not tend to persist in their job should they be seemingly not satisfied with various features. In terms of low income, should the company be unable to pay its staff with a competitive salary corresponding to their dedication, the rate of turnover is more likely to increase for a long run. According to a novel newspaper, more than 500 railway workers have quit their job because the payment is insufficient, despite the fact that the work is tough, demands a high level of responsibility, and involves risk. When it comes to the relationship with the manager, it occupies a pivotal role in a stable job. If some body can not get on well with their owner, leaving the job is inevitable.
Additionally, almost all employees crave to experience more positions in distinct businesses because it is beneficial for them. Firstly, jumping jobs from one company to another frequently does a favor for employees to gain knowledge and broaden their horizon. To illustrate this point, staff are able to meet and learn from a myriad kind of person regardless of class and age. Some people can give them useful advice and the others can encounter them and leave reality lessons. Furthermore, it, coincidently, is a promising promotion opportunity for staff members. Due to their prior work experience, they may be appointed to higher positions more easily than fresh graduates, and a new job comes with a handsome salary.
To summarize, switching workplaces and managers is crucial since it allows employees to take on greater tasks and acquire experience in a variety of businesses.
- The internet has changed the way we communicate Much communication today happens through social media Some people support this and think it is a positive development Others believe that social media have negative effects Discuss both these views and give 78
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 73
- Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 90
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...pies a pivotal role in a stable job. If some body can not get on well with their owner, l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, well, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85787162717 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0443819768 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223334292565 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697517330596 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428174821704 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121142475725 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759442828543 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...pies a pivotal role in a stable job. If some body can not get on well with their owner, l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, well, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85787162717 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0443819768 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223334292565 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697517330596 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428174821704 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121142475725 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759442828543 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.