Nowadays, the possibility of traveling to faraway destinations, like polar regions, exists for explorers and travelers. The principal advantage of this is the opportunity for new research and explorations, but it does not outweigh the disadvantage of pollution that traveling would cause on the environment.
The major drawback of people traveling to unpolluted places is the chance of getting tourist destinations polluted. In other words, frequently visited attractions are more prone to get unclean, in terms of air, water, land, and noise. This is already a detrimental issue all over the world, where human activities, such as traveling and research, are predominant. However, luckily, very few rain forests and poles remain isolated without the influence of mankind and, therefore, it would be wiser to keep these valuables untouched. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Oxford University, in which they claimed the rate of melting polar ice caps due to global warming would have increased by 75% if people had been allowed to visit the region.
That being said, having people in a place may bring some positives such as new inventions. Were biologists to visit new naturals, they will experiment with all living and non-living things there; nevertheless, it will bring a little benefit to humans if any. For instance, researchers may find out how the polar wolf maintains its’ body temperature, although the finding does not affect people.
In conclusion, currently, individuals have the opportunity of going to distant natural regions. An advantage of this tendency is discoveries, which have a little or no effect on human life, and it does not outweigh the primary disadvantage of environmental pollution.
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 73
- The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam 67
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- TOPIC Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: YOURS_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: An apostrophe is never used to form possessive case pronouns. Did you mean: 'its'?
Suggestion: its
...y find out how the polar wolf maintains its’ body temperature, although the finding ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37362637363 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01542412858 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652014652015 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1575680567 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191583072481 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663027630678 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06170726088 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120953220246 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745714668567 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.