The maps illustrate the changes made to the transport system around the city hospital from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the most noticeable change was the addition of 2 roundabouts on the hospital road. In addition, dramatic alterations were made to the parking facilities.
In terms of the road system, a roundabout was built in the junction between the city road and the hospital road, and the second roundabout was added to the junction where the hospital road met the ring road. The green areas on either side of the hospital road in 2007 were removed and a bus station was constructed on the left of the hospital road with road access to the 2 new roundabouts. The ring road remained unchanged over the period.
Parking facilities were also improved over 4 years. In 2007, there was a common car park for the staff and the public to the right of the hospital road. However, in 2010, it was dedicated to the staff, while a new public car park was built to the right of the eastern ring road, with access to the ring road.
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparison where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The given maps show condition of Felixstone in 1967 and in 2001 73
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60869565217 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43369055478 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461956521739 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.620983547 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204679963743 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936336245076 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680005652549 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136213598162 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611772922473 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.