These days, going to far-flung corners of the world, both for tourism and scientific purposes, is no longer an impossible task for human beings. Personally, the disadvantages of this pale into insignificance compared to its merits, as now can be explained.
Travelling activities and researching may be potential threats to the environment and natural habitats, regarding some of their aspects. Perhaps ozone layer depletion in the South Pole- the precursor to an escalating rate of global warming, is a prominent example. Supposing laboratories and accommodations for shock tourism had not been established there, large amounts of emission, mainly consisting of methane and CO2, would not have entered the stratosphere and depleted ozone layers. Also, quantities of seals, penguins and other Antarctic faunas had seen steady rises until the appearance of tourists with recreational hunting as well animal capturing for scientific researches on their homeland several decades ago, which prove our detrimental impacts on the ecosystems of where we travel to
Having said that, with the recent paradigm shift from conventional to responsible tourism, not only its drawbacks mentioned above were curbed, but also some advantages can be observed. More and more travel lovers are environmentally conscious, which can be explained by the increasing popularity of responsible tourism. By understanding that unspoilt areas would attract influx of tourists, local governments would rather conserve those areas instead of overexploiting for short-term economic benefits.
Besides, by having accessed to pristine areas like North and South poles, some animals can be brought back from extinction. Under ice layers is a reservoir of genes from frozen ancient animal matters as well as animalcules. With resurrection biology such as cloning technique, some of them were able to be revived using cutting-edge instruments, for example, Tardigrade by Japanese scientists.
To conclude, despite some notable drawbacks, the appearance of tourists and scientists in remote areas do have significant benefits to the environment, which can be seen in the case of sustainable tourism and de-extinction technology.
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 84
- Most people think that truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to news Do you think all news true What is the function of newspaper 89
- With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 89
- With a growing population many people believe that we should focus on producing more GM genetically modified foods What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, regarding, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75229357798 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14958580906 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660550458716 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.310582173 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.75 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174733213815 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559794725706 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347156933263 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866922760227 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329006408579 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.