The table chart gives information about the percentage of Australians who went to the cinema and their frequency from 1994 to 2002, and the line graph shows the average number of cinema visits by four distinct age groups.
Overall, it is clear that the rate of cinema attendants tended to rise, while there was an opposite trend which could be seen in their frequency. Besides, all age groups witnessed fluctuations in their figures, and 14-24 years old were the most frequent cinema visitors.
In 1994, about 67% of the total population went to the cinema about 10.7 times a year. This attendance increased to 72% two years later and then remained stable until 2002, despite a fall of 2% from 1998 to 2000. Meanwhile, the average frequency reached a peak at 11.3 times in 1996, before falling significantly to 8,3 times in 2002.
Initially, the youngest group went to the cinema 12 times yearly, followed by 25-24 and 35-49, at about 10 times and 9 times respectively. In contrast, the figure for the oldest group was lowest, at only 8 times per year. In 1996, the figures for all groups rose by about 2 times, more or less, before decreasing by nearly 5 times in 1998. After that, the number of visits of each group grew slightly but the most regular visits still belonged to the youngest group, with about 10 times.
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 89
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, still, then, while, in contrast, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72413793103 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41323885262 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6147511257 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225104915639 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892858199458 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968781128128 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157712836015 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1114214394 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.